Multi-scanning Kodachrome produced much more shadow detail with Silverfast.So I selected Silverfast on the basis of doing a better job with Kodachrome than Scanvue.
I also have about 10 thousand B&W negatives, and maybe one thousand color negatives, all 35 mm. The vast majority are Kodachrome, with Ektachrome probably 15-20%. I have, at a rough estimate 30-40 thousand slides, all Kodak. My specific use case is that I have this scanner, including the SF-210 batch feeder, which has a 50 slide capacity.
I use Lightroom for all my digital photo cataloging and editing, etc., so all I wanted was the best possible scan that I could process in Lightroom with the same tools. When I first starting comparing these two applications, I thought I would end up with Scanvue, because it was a lot less money than Silverfast and honestly I don't need all the image editing features in Silverfast.
0 kommentar(er)
